A Socio-Legal Approach to Administrative Justice*
نویسنده
چکیده
The first part of this article outlines two complementary approaches to enhancing administrative justice. Internal mechanisms, which can be put into place by government departments and public bodies themselves, are contrasted with external mechanisms, which result in the imposition on government departments and public bodies of principles enunciated by courts, tribunals, and ombudsmen. Lawyers are all too familiar with the external approach but tend to be much less familiar with the internal approach. The article seeks to redress this imbalance. It emphasizes the importance of the internal approach, not as an alternative but, rather, as a complement to the external approach and develops a framework for analyzing administrative justice in terms of “trade-offs” between different normative models of administrative decision-making. The second part of the article demonstrates how this approach to the study of administrative justice has informed research on the impact of computerization on social security in the United Kingdom; on decision making in the Scottish prison system; on the assessment of special educational needs in England and Scotland; and on the computerization of social security in thirteen countries. The article concludes by attempting to show that this approach to the study of administrative justice satisfies all the defining characteristics of the socio-legal paradigm.
منابع مشابه
نظارت قضایی دیوان عدالت اداری بر انتصابهای اداری
Administrative appointments are internal decisions which normally have legal effect, Administrative measures are so differents, but how dose not refer to citizens. In some legal systems internal decisions are not subject to judicial review. This article proves that Administrative Justice Court has jurisdiction to administrative appointment, but given that this is not general decision which ca...
متن کاملCompetent Authorities to Handle Complaints about Incorrect Tax Assessment and Collection with an Ethical Approach in Iran
Background: Retrial is an additional combination of the words "retrial" and "trial". Trial is a means of justice and trial, like others, is in the introduction of error and error if there is a verdict that is accompanied by error as a result of the trial. Which must be reconsidered. In the relations between taxpayers and the tax system, a dispute is possible, which can be due to factors such as...
متن کاملThe Role of Judicial Procedure Courts in the Development of Iranian Administrative Law
Today, in leading administrative law systems, the judicial process along with the law is the most important source of legal rules, and the law alone can not feed the legal system. Although in the administrative law system of Iran, the use of judicial procedure has often been considered as a source and interpretation of the law and not as the main source, but the role of administrative courts, ...
متن کاملApplication of Lex Mercatoria as Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration
In settling disputes regarding international commercial arbitration the parties may instead of choosing the law of one country to choose lex mercatoria or the law of merchants as a applicable law to the disputes. When this choice is possible that applicable choice of law rules recognize such power for the parties. The principle of autonomy is choosing lex mercatoria has been recognized in many ...
متن کاملSubstantive trial in The Administrative Justice Tribunal
In the new regulations of Administrative Justice Tribunal, substantive proceedings were also brought in the proceedings, which are the innovations of the Code of the Organization and the Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Justice Tribunal. The new lawmaking approach in the new law is the possibility of the complete administrative litigation in Administrative Justice Tribunal, which requir...
متن کامل